VOX POPULI
by
S Kamat
as
Aam Admi
Issue: 237 Date: 25.06.2018
Visit: aamadmi.blogspot.com or aamadmivoices.blogspot.com
by
S Kamat
as
Aam Admi
Issue: 237 Date: 25.06.2018
Visit: aamadmi.blogspot.com or aamadmivoices.blogspot.com
Contents:1. BJP Fails In Kashmir2. One Arvind Follows Another3. TMC vs. BJP : Who's More Militant?4. Cancer Cases On The Rise Near Atomic Power Plants In IndiaBJP Fails In KashmirPulling out of the coalition with PDP in J&K and allowing that government to fall is clearly the sign of BJP accepting that it failed in the troubled State. This is yet another negative mark on the report card of the BJP's ability to govern. Firstly the conception of a coalition with the PDP was at fault, since ideologies and objectives of the parties were completely different. This led to one blaming the other when anything went wrong in the trouble-torn State. The PDP took advantage of this fact to the hilt since if it was not the BJP at fault then it was the BJP at the Centre that was not doing enough or was to blame. Thus governance needs a foresight of the ability to remain in power and perform which the BJP sorely lacks. It is more of an opportunistic approach that the BJP follows as we have seen of cobbling up a government and we will manage as we go along. This self-serving approach of wanting to be compulsively in power does not work and hurts the interest of the people which we have seen across India. As for Kashmir with the law and order situation deteriorating the BJP would have found it inopportune to ask for Governor's rule therefore it was best to quit the government. Governor N N Vohra has in the next instance almost as if waiting in the wings asked forGovernor's rule in J&K which is a fait accompli now.One Arvind Follows AnotherBy giving the most school-boyish kind of reason of expecting a grandchild Arvind Subramanian has made his exit from the post of Chief Economic Advisor of the Government of India. One would have expected keeping in mind the gravitas of the chair that he was occupying that he should have come up with a more plausible reason for his exit. In any case irrespective of the reason, it is good that we have had both the Arvinds, Subramanian now and the Panagariya earlier leave. Contrary to the fact that these foreign based economists bring enhanced expertise and knowledge to the job in India, it is found that such expertise is not relevant in the Indian context both in concept as well in the possibility of implementation. Thus they end up as glorified advisors without any of their ideas being put into action. They also do not understand the mechanics of the working of Indian government and our infamous bureaucracy and tend to get ignored when it comes to decisions to be taken on any policy matter. Thus apart from the occasional press conference or being called to address some gathering or other these advisors find themselves twiddling their thumbs. Slowly disenchantment sets in followed by disappointment and then comes the act of preparing excuses to find a way out. This is how becoming a grandfather becomes reason enough to leave the post of the Chief Economic Advisor of the Government of India! The other angle to these people coming to India is not to benefit the country but to benefit themselves. Working as the Chief Economic Advisor of the Government of India or Vice Chairman of the NITI Aayog, the former Planning Commission, has its own prestige internationally considering on the economic front India is a focus country what with its high growth rates when other countries including China are dawdling. Handling the complexity of the Indian economy, it is perceived that this experience is valuable because it is believed to be so challenging. That is why if your CV says worked in India it is good enough to be short-listed for prestigious international assignments as Raghuram Rajan has seen. Rajan was short-listed for the job of Governor of the Bank of England as reported in the media recently. So all these foreign based Indian economists come and accept India assignments to further their own careers and also to get the opportunity to come back home. While what we should be doing is that give these opportunities to our own India economists. A start has been made with Rajiv Kumar at the Niti Aayog and such other positions should be given to India based economists. These local people will have the expertise of the India story, they have been through the grind here, they are familiar with how things work here and are more likely to come up with proposals and policy measures that are more practical and implementable. One hopes that we will go this way for persons to be appointed as the Chief Economic Advisor and other similar positions from now on.
TMC vs. BJP : Who's More Militant?Mamata Banerjee calling the BJP a 'militant organisation' is like the pot calling the kettle black. TMC the party she leads has used violence as a primary method to come to power by its confrontational encounters with the Communists and since then using the very same methods to consolidate her hold on power and lately to combat the BJP in Bengal who have been trying to expand their support base there. Mamata Banerjee's upcoming trip to China as the head of an official delegation of the Govt. of India had to be postponed because of the lukewarm response from the Chinese side in setting up meetings with appropriate level officials within their government. Mamata Banerjee could well ponder whether the reason for this is the fact of the TMC having been accused of killing many Communists in the past.Cancer Cases On The Rise Near Atomic Power Plants In IndiaMedia reports have indicated that cancer cases have shot up by more than 200% near the Kaiga Atomic Power Plant and adjoining areas in a study done over the period 2010-13 by the Tata Memorial Centre, the findings of which were released only recently. This goes to show that nuclear facilities near populated areas are a major risk to people including future generations. The Nuclear Power Board and the government remain in denial over the above findings. Their approach has been to pick holes in the report by saying that the report should have been more broad based and that incidence of cancer in any case among the Indian population has been on the rise for many reasons. This, however, does not take away the veracity that cancer has been affecting those who live in the proximity of facilities involved with the handling of nuclear energy. Therefore it is important that the government take cognizance of this fact and reverse the decisions to install larger capacities of nuclear power generation facilities across the country. Even for reasons other than the above there have been massive public protests about the nuclear power station coming up near Ratnagiri in Maharashtra as also lately about the expansion of the nuclear facility in Tarapur again in Maharashtra. Most of the nuclear power stations coming up in a new expansion program across India from Russian Cos., Westinghouse and the French Co. Areva need to be reviewed and the program shut down. This is for two reasons, the first is that these reactors particularly from the West are not even proven in their country of origin and who also do not use them then why should we become guinea pigs for these Cos. to prove their reactor plants. The second is that with our high population distribution near these proposed nuclear facilities we are inviting risks like Fukushima, Three Mile Island and Chernobyl to happen. The incremental demand for power in the next decade at least we can plan to supply through renewables like solar energy and other sources which are safer and less risky. With technology upgradation in the areas like solar costs per unit for electrical power is comparable if not cheaper than that from thermal generation. Moreover renewable power plants have a faster capacity creation possibility. For these reasons the government should give a massive push for electricity generation through renewables.*******************************