by
AAM ADMI
Issue No. : N 006
Issue Date: 14 Nov 2022
Contents:
1. Is the Supreme Court always right?
2. Another World Cup Gone! No trophies. How long do we have to wait?
3. The Demonetisation Spin
4. Cyrus Mistry Accident To Be Proceeded Against by Maharashtra Police
Is the Supreme Court always right? : 13th Nov 2022
The rape and murder of a 19 year old girl in the Chawla area of Delhi during 2012 and the recent acquittal of the assailants on procedural issues by the Supreme Court is a sad commentary on the justice system of India. The High Court had while sentencing the rapists to death described the case as 'rarest of the rare' considering the cruelty and bestiality exhibited. The Supreme Court though admitting that the assailants had committed a heinous act decided to let them off on counts of shoddy investigation by the Delhi Police. This one thinks is an error on the part of the Supreme Court since it sends out the wrong message out to society particularly future rapists who will try to buy out the system and thus go scot free. What the Supreme Court could have done is either referred the case back to the High Court and instructed it to order a re-investigation so that proper punishment could be meted out to the assailants. One does not expect the Supreme Court to throw up its hands on procedural issues and as a consequence of that acquit offenders. The disturbing part of this judgment by the 3 Judge Bench was that it comprised the earlier Chief Justice of India, Justice Lalit. One would think the last few of his judgments before he retired.
Another World Cup Gone! No trophies. How long do we have to wait? :
12th Nov 2022
The semifinal clash with England in the T20I World Cup at Adelaide was a disaster for India. It showed up yet again the inability of ours to defend scores, any scores. The 169 for victory that India put up for England to get was not a bad score. It was our bowlers who let us down and Rohit Sharma failed in to ring the proper bowling changes. There is nothing to take away from Buttler and Hales who put up a classic show of aggressive batting and sent our bowlers on a leather hunt. Our cricketing team strategists including Rahul David, the coach, have not drummed into the bowler's heads that in T20 sometimes taking wickets is not important but you got to contain the batsmen and give away less runs. Rohit on his part sometimes does not see things correctly. Like going into the middle overs when our bowlers were being hit all around the park, he should have brought Shami in earlier. Granted Shami is more effective with the older ball and in the end covers he takes wickets. But when your other bowlers are leaking runs bring Shami in to see if he could stem the tide. Finally when Shami was given the ball he did give away less runs than the others and he got the first real chance of a wicket, which catch Surya Kant Yadav muffed. Anyway with the current squad and with Kohli coming into form we had a real shot at the T20I World Cup this time which was not to be. We can console ourselves that there will be another time, another trophy, another place and wish our cricket team all the best. They played well but they need to show endurance and stay the course for the full championship. They also need to remember that we criticise them so that they can do better the next time.
The Demonetisation Spin : 11th Nov 2022
Leading up to the anniversary of Demonetisation on 8th November, there have been many stories doing the rounds of the media. These are more in the nature of a spin on the pros and cons of the Demonetisation exercise. It is precisely in these conflicting stories that India's credibility about any economic figures lies in tatters. Just about a week ago it was reported that cash in the economy is much lower than what it was in 2016. Then a few days back we are told that the cash is almost at double the level it was in 2016. The latter report is more plausible since in multiple reports over the years since Demonetisation it was stated that the cash use in the economy has not fallen. In contrast it has risen signifying that the transition towards a digital economy is slowed down. It is not that card transactions have reduced. They have also shown growth, what we call organic growth consistent with their trends but nothing dramatic to indicate that it is replacing cash on a massive scale. In India we need to understand that public acceptance of any measure is slow. This is because of our diversity both geographical and economic. Unless an individual is able to rationalise the measure in his mind, he rarely accepts it. The political leadership if they are in a hurry like in this measure of converting people to plastic money, they will always fail or come up a cropper. Media also complicates these issues by not reporting the correct news. Media today, a majority of them owned by large industrial groups are agenda driven and play up to vested interests for their own reasons. It is rare to see any independent media entity which reports the news as it is. In the above context, there was a media report the other day citing a lady Dy Governor of the RBI saying that the buoyant GST collection and increased direct tax growth was related to the better compliance that Demonetisation has engineered. One does not know whether Shaktikanta Das' tenure is scheduled for completion making this lady to laud the incumbent government to earn brownie points for her candidature to seek the Governor's chair. The increased GST collection is like a misconception since earlier the majority of the Sales Tax would have been collected by the States but now everything comes to the Centre. So the Centre's pile has grown bigger giving the relatively false impression that the indirect sales tax, now called GST, has grown. As for direct taxes the coverage is still very low compared to developed countries and trends of increased compliance are good and healthy though how Demonetisation can be linked to buoyancy in income tax is not understood.
Cyrus Mistry Accident To Be Proceeded Against by Maharashtra Police : 8th Nov 2022
The Maharashtra police is understood to have filed a case of rash driving against the lady gynaecologist Pandole who was at the wheel of the Mercedes Benz car which met an accident and in which Cyrus Mistry and one other person died. This is the correct way to go. There has been a lot of spin attempted about the accident ranging from problems with the car to the design of the highway at the point where the accident happened. On the latter even our Central Minister of Road Transport, Nitin Gadkari has joined issue claiming that the highway at that point indeed narrowed and he would in the future have foreign experts design our highways, in contrast of his present stand to support local highway engineering experts. All this is being clearly done because the Pandoles are well-off and one would assume well connected. The system clearly is out to protect them and transfer blame to other entities so that they get off scot-free in this incident. This should not be allowed. One has all the sympathies for those involved in the accident but the driver should take responsibility. Here we need to state that highway driving is not easy and one needs to be used to it. It is also far removed from city driving and that is where lady driver lapsed into error which led to the accident. If it were not for the death of Cyrus Mistry in this accident and the hi-profile nature of the other occupants of the car, this incident would just have been written off as yet another highway accident adding to the rising statistics of such cases.
**********************
If you have any issues with the contents of this blog, you can respond to:
S Kamat
Mob: 0 7218698906
Email: kamatsrinivas@hotmail.com