Thursday, October 13, 2016

OPinionatED
or
VOX POPULI

by

Aam Admi

Issue: 171                 Date:  10.10.2016

Contents:

1.      Dealing With Pakistan

2.      Indian Railways Needs To Change Tack & Tracks

3.      The US Presidential Elections


Dealing With Pakistan

The manner that we have been dealing with Pakistan post-Uri attack and even earlier is somewhat odd and clearly illogical. In size terms by population Pakistan is probably just about 15% of India, in geographical terms it is just a sliver torn off India. Thus the attention that we pay to that country across our media and also in terms of mindshare of our people, is grossly disproportionate and much more than what Pakistan deserves. Figuratively speaking Pakistan is just an ant on the Indian elephant's back and should be treated as such. However one cannot comprehend why we make a big deal of what Pakistan says or does. Recognised that we have a shared contentious history going back some six decades or more about Kashmir which is a pusurating sore. Strategically also the fact that Pakistan is in possession of nuclear bombs and in fact may be leading India in terms of tactical nuclear weapons, demands that we deal with them with caution. We also need to understand that the country Pakistan was born out of the trauma of Partition and this is the trauma that it has been fighting these last six decades or more.

Thus if you look at Pakistan’s role in international circles over this period it has to do with strife and discord. Allying with the US in the Cold War years it was involved in Afghanistan so that America could have an access into the old USSR. That is how it got involved in a proxy war, for America, with the Russians who had moved into Afghanistan a few years later. This cemented Pakistan’s presence in Afghanistan overseeing, in a manner of speaking, the transition from first the monarchy to a temporary government until the Taliban and the Al Qaeda took over the country in 2010 and then it was up to Karzai put Pakistan’s ISI in their place upon taking up the office of the President of Afghanistan. This involvement in low intensity war served Pakistan two-fold. First an easy access to arms and second, the experience to continue the same proxy war in Kashmir under the pretext of supporting a ‘freedom’ struggle.

The other thing is that as a nation Pakistan has no real reason for its existence. It is by creating problems for others that it justifies its existence.  Thus with India its Kashmir and which Pakistan has been carefully nurturing for close to six decades now. They did the same thing with successively the Taliban, Al Qaeda and now ISIS supporting these terror groups in their infancy which then spread terrorism around the world. Any major terrorist strike anywhere in the world be it 9/11 or any other has had a Pakistani involved or has its origins in Pakistan or with some link to Pakistan. And through all this Pakistan claims that it is a victim of terrorism little realizing that if you play with terror it is only a matter of time before it strikes back to you. Actually this position for Pakistan is a ploy to see3k sympathy. The world has realized this and now know that the Pakistan government and its agencies are complicit with terror. This has been partly achieved with India’s diplomatic efforts which have to a great extent cornered Pakistan as a safe haven for terror and an active instigator when it comes to initiating terror in Kashmir and India.

In these circumstances it is best that India does not fall into the trap of reacting to what Pakistan says since it is again a ruse to draw India out and have the focus of world opinion back on itself.  This is also with a hope that in India’s reaction it may trip itself and give Pakistan an opportunity to say – I told you so. In most statements or announcements that come from Pakistan we need to take it with a large pinch of salt since it has been found more often than not that they tend to be more liberal with the truth and rarely say what they actually mean.

Thus the best method for India is to ignore Pakistan’s utterances but continue the diplomatic initiatives in international circles to try and get them named as a ‘terror haven’ which will leave them hobbled in taking any further action. In the event that Pakistan or its agencies initiates or participates in any attacks on Indian soil like Pathankot or Uri, we should respond with the principle that if you give us a bloody nose, we will give you a bloody face. The more India tends to respond to Pakistan in the media, it elevates the position of Pakistan and implies that they are of an equal status to India. The strategy therefore is to keep Pakistan in its place.


Indian Railways Needs To Change Tack & Tracks

Just last month an elderly lady was thrown onto the tracks near Dhanbad station when she was accosted by a man who had entered the sleeper compartment in the early hours of the morning and was bent upon snatching a bag that the lady had wound around her arm. In the attack which the lady resisted she was pulled out of the train compartment even before her cries for help   woke up her co-passengers from sleep. Luckily the lady got off with minor injuries. Then just a couple of weeks back we had armed dacoits attacking three groups of passengers in succession at the outer signal of Kanpur station. Then last week another lady complained that on the train her handbag was gnawed through by rats. There have been many complaints about rats infesting the compartments near the pantry cars of most trains and passengers afraid to sleep for fear of their getting bit. There was a time with the Indian Railways when the sleeper coaches were considered safe because they would be locked down in the night.  There would be an attendant or ticket inspector to help people getting in or out of the train at wayside stations during the night. Nothing like that happens now and the security of passengers is neglected to the extent that it is considered unsafe to travel in sleeper coaches. If you happen to travel by train you will notice it is standard practice of passengers to carry their own chain and lock to secure their baggage to any fixture in the coach. This was rarely done in the past. As for hygiene and rat infestation, if you peep into any of the pantry cars on trains you will never have any food on the train for the rest of your life. But instead of attending to these basic issues of safety, security and hygiene, the Indian Railways are concentrating on ultra-fast trains, TALGO coaches, flexible pricing and introduction of new trains with more amenities in the interest of increasing their revenue earnings from passenger traffic. The emphasis is clearly wrong since unless the basic issues as above are not tackled it will not be long before the new trains go the same way as the rest of the trains on the Indian Railways now. The Railway Minister, Suresh Prabhu need to change the emphasis and bring back the service orientation of the Indian Railways to serve the common citizen rather than try to convert it to a high flying transportation option competing with airlines. For this the aam admin would be forever grateful. 

The US Presidential Elections

It is well-known that the worst of America comes out at the time of the US Presidential elections. In the final lap of the 2016 elections with Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton throwing mud at each other, more by the former than the latter, the contest is running true to form. But if one does an objective analysis of the candidates and the muck that they have been throwing at each other during the election campaign, the conclusion that emerges is that the present elections have possibly the most unsuitable candidates in general of the last few US Presidential elections since Richard Nixon was elected to the Oval Office. Hilary Clinton is coming out as the better of the two worst candidates leaving the American people no choice so to speak. But is she fit for the Presidency is the question that must be dogging many minds in the US? Coming as the first serious woman candidate for the US Presidency she arrives with the persuasive argument of the need to create more history on the back of the first black US President demitting office. This argument has become all the more compelling now with Donald Trump's utterances and antics that clearly make him unfit to become the President of the USA. On top of some of Donald Trump's unusual opinions, he has exhibited a shockingly ignorant position on foreign policy and international matters which has many doubting his sanity. The shallowness of his public statements and his reactions to cast blame and accuse others are some of the attributes that do no good for his seeking the credentials to be the next President of the USA. Lately with even the GOP leaders backing away from Trump’s candidature one must seriously doubt the decision-making process of the Republican party for having endorsed Trump as the party’s Presidential candidate after initial doubts and then just about four weeks prior to the elections pulling back its support. As for Hilary Clinton one must say she has been making the right noises and having used her pedigree of having been First Lady in the White House and then the first woman Secretary of State of the USA, she has come across as a relatively better shining light fit to become the next US President. But even then serious doubts remain on her credibility to be liberal with the truth in the matter of coming out clearly on the private server and email issue, the inability of sometimes to control her flaming temper which it is said that even Bill Clinton remains in fear of and the last thing which just came up last month was her health issue. For fear of being branded anti-feminist one must state that in both US Presidential debates she did not seem to come off as President material. With the two Presidential candidates likely to having serious performance issues, more Trump than Clinton, the focus needs to shift to the Vice Presidential candidates. The chances of Donald Trump winning are a long shot but even if he does we need to consider an outside chance at possibly an impeachment process into his second term when his VP will be expected to sit in the Oval office. One must say that Mike Pence, though still very much an unknown factor, has acquitted himself creditably in the VP debate and one can take comfort in his level headedness in contrast to Trump’s uninhibited and uncontrolled flamboyance. As for the chance of Hilary Clinton seeing health issues into her first term as President if she wins it, which is what is most likely to happen, it will be Tim Kaine who will take over. Kaine seems to fit in like a glove in the long list of unassuming US Vice Presidents and can be expected to hold the fort. But come December 2016 it is not only the USA but also the world which will be seeing uncertain times what with the most powerful democracy in the world going through a change of guard.


**********************************

No comments:

Post a Comment